Legal Opinion
Bridgestone Investment Corp. v. Usdc-Casf
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 8, 2019No. 19-70031Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 8 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BRIDGESTONE INVESTMENT No. 19-70031 CORPORATION LIMITED, ______________________________ D.C. No. 3:18-cv-04865-EMC BRIDGESTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, MEMORANDUM* Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent, KALMAN ISAACS; et al., Real Parties in Interest. Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Argued and Submitted August 7, 2019 San Francisco, California Before: O'SCANNLAIN, SILER,** and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.