Legal Opinion

McCray v. Sapulpa Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1929No. 8418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the fourth appeal in litigation arising out of the controversy between appellant and Sapulpa Petroleum Company and receivers of its property, The district court of Creek county, OH., appointed a receiver for a part of the petroleum company’s property, and in a suit brought by-McCray against that company in the court below he obtained the appointment of a receiver for other parts of its property. A history of the litigation is found in Sapulpa Petroleum Co. v. McCray (C. C. A.) 4 F.*438(2d) 645; Fulp v. McCray (C. C. A.) 21 F.(2d) 951; and McCray v. Sapulpa Petroleum Co. (C. C. A.) 21…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fulp v. McCrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. McCray v. Sapulpa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schokbeton Industries, Inc. v. Schokbeton Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Robert Boris Beachboard v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. In The Matter Of Schokbeton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API