Legal Opinion

United States v. One Dodge Sedan

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1940No. 7281PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

The learned district court rendered its judgment with obvious reluctance. That reluctance appears both in its opinion and in the colloquies. It felt itself bound, however, by the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Coffey v. United States, 116 U.S. 436, 6 S.Ct. 437, 29 L.Ed. 684. That case has received a distinctly “unfavorable press”. It has also suffered by implication, at least, in later decisions of the same tribunal. These cases certainly limit its holding to the particular facts. One has indeed the impression that only the shibboleth of “stare…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Various Items of Personal Property v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Hepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Mauch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. One 1956 Ford Tudor Sedan (Victoria) Motor No. M6nv-112513 (Steve Kaluk, Jr., Claimant)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. Howell F. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API