Legal Opinion

PacifiCorp Capital, Inc. v. Hansen Properties

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 6, 1995No. 92 Civ. 9390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*286MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

This motion is the product of plaintiffs failure to ensure that the defendant was properly named in the summons- and complaint and raises the question whether such a defect may be corrected long after the case has gone to judgment. In the circumstances of this case, the Court concludes that it may.

Plaintiff PacifiCorp Capital, Inc. (“PCI”) obtained a default judgment against defendant Hansen Properties which was entered on the docket on March 11, 1993. The judgment was the culmination of an action on a 1988 equipment lease between plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. KeenanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Fluoro Electric Corporation v. Branford AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. World Carriers, Incorporated, a Corporation v. Louis L. Bright, Lemel Silas v. Paroh Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  4. Silas v. Paroh Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. León García v. Restaurante El TropicalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2001
  2. Reisbeck, LLC v. LevisColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Labor v. Sun Hill Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Francisco León García v. Restaurante El TropicalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2001
  5. Art & Antique Gallery, Inc. v. CuginiMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API