Legal Opinion

East & Collins v. Burns

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. H. H. Co ox, Cb.

1Opinion of the CourtWii.kes, J.

This is a bill to have construed the will of M. Burns. The material facts imported by tbe Court of Chancery Appeals, are: July 4, 1896, M. Burns died in Davidson County, *171Tenn., leaving no widow, but children and grandchildren. His estate was large, consisting of both realty and personalty. His indebtedness at his death was trifling in comparison with the value of his estate. He left a will and several codicils. The material parts of the will are as follows:

“Item 4. I direct that equality shall be the controlling rule in the division of my estate between my children and the descendants of such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stimson v. . VromanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Thrasher v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  3. Crecelius v. HorstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Towns v. WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. McAdams v. McHenrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  2. Hoggatt v. CloptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Moore v. NeelyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. First American National Bank v. ColeTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Cannon v. EwinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API