Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States Ex Rel. Medeiros v. Watkins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 9, 1948No. 112, Docket 20795Published

1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge

Were my colleagues’ decision correct, the following rule would now prevail: If a citizen leaves this country and if, upon his return, the immigration officials give him a hearing after which they decide as a fact that he is not a citizen, that decision is final, provided only there was conflicting evidence before those officials as to his citizenship, and the hearing was fair. I cannot agree. I therefore think that the district judge erred in holding that relator here was not entitled to a judicial trial de novo of his claim to citizenship.1

*901Where the immigration authorities seek to deport an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API