United States Ex Rel. Medeiros v. Watkins
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge
Were my colleagues’ decision correct, the following rule would now prevail: If a citizen leaves this country and if, upon his return, the immigration officials give him a hearing after which they decide as a fact that he is not a citizen, that decision is final, provided only there was conflicting evidence before those officials as to his citizenship, and the hearing was fair. I cannot agree. I therefore think that the district judge erred in holding that relator here was not entitled to a judicial trial de novo of his claim to citizenship.1
*901Where the immigration authorities seek to deport an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.