Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Harris

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1927Published

1Per curiam

The complaint in the prior action did not allege facts warranting the imprisonment of the plaintiff’s husband under body execution. (Segelken v. Meyer, 94 N. Y. 473; Lange v. Schile, 111 App. Div. 613; All-Package G. Stores Co. v. McAtamney, 174 id. 778.)

Delehanty and Lydon, JJ., concur; Levy, J., dissents, with opinion.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Segelken v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Lange v. SchileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906