Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1991No. 89C-21518; CA A63724Published

1Per curiam

Defendant petitions for review of our decision that affirmed, without opinion, his convictions on three counts of assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, and carrying a dangerous weapon with intent to use it unlawfully. ORS 166.220.105 Or App 414, 804 P2d 1231 (1991). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), allow it in the light of State v. Racicot, 106 Or App 557, 809 P2d 726 (1991), and adhere to our decision.

Defendant challenges the imposition of consecutive sentences on the ground that the trial court did not make the findings required by ORS 137.122. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RacicotCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. FranskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. FranskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API