Legal Opinion

Peppler v. Roffe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 26, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heheb, J.

We concur in the view of the learned vice-chancellor that defendant Emeline Roffe has not established her claim of title to the disputed shares of the capital stock of the High-wood Realty and Building Company. The essentials of a valid gift inter vivos were not proven. The evidence does not warrant the finding of either a donative intent or the donor’s delivery of the subject-matter, accompanied by a complete surrender of ownership and dominion, requisite to a gift of this character. The stock was not transferred on the corporate books. It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Highberger v. StifflerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  2. Whelan v. WhelanNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  3. Comstock v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Brice v. BriceNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Amratlal C. Bhagat v. Bharat A. Bhagat (068312)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Blake v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  4. Giacobbi v. AnselmiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Vanderbach v. VollingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API