Legal Opinion

Belt v. Stetson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of tbe municipal court of St. Paul.

1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.

According to the findings of fact by tne court below, the shutters, the value of which is sought to be recovered in this action, were furnished by plaintiff, and affixed to the building of defendants, which was then occupied by them, *412between the 19th day of June and the 10th day of July, 1878, under a special agreement .containing a precedent condition that they should conform to a certain designated sample, in pattern, description and quality, else defendants would not be required to take and pay for them; and they were wholly unlike the sample in all respects. The correctness of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. MarcumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API