Faulds v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James Faulds is serving a 360-month sentence for possessing and distributing child pornography. In this collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2266, Faulds argues that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel in his direct appeal. The district court denied Faulds’s motion to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence. Because Faulds identifies no prejudice from his appellate counsel’s assistance, we affirm.
I
In July 2006 an undercover investigator downloaded 12 still images and one video that Faulds had made available in an Internet chatroom. The downloaded images depict the sexual…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Todd Peterson v. Timothy DoumaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Ray Donald LoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Faulds, Jr. v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- McMillian v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022