Legal Opinion

Van Winkle v. Henkle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1919No. 10018PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by W. H. Henkle and another against J. M. Van Winkle. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action, commenced by the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the purpose of cancelling and setting aside an oil and gas lease for fraud in its procurement. Upon trial to the court, without the intervention of a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be called “plaintiffs” and “defendant”, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

The grounds relied upon for reversing the judgment of the trial court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. SUTTON v. DAVID STANLEY CHEVROLETSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Haggerty v. KeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Morris v. McLendonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Liles v. BigpondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API