Legal Opinion

Hamelik v. Sypek

New York County Courts

Decided September 21, 1934No. Case No. 41; Case No. 42PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.

The above two cases were tried together at the September term of this court, not by order of the court, but by consent of counsel. They grew out of an automobile accident occurring on June third of this year in which a car driven by Martin Hamelik collided with a car owned by Leo Sypek and driven by his brother, Steve Sypek. Martin Hamelik sued Steve Sypek for injuries to his car and Steve counterclaimed for injuries to his person. Leo Sypek brought an action against Martin Hamelik for damages to his car. As stated, the cases were tried together by consent of counsel. The damages in each case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. GrobsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Parker v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pakkala v. FendrickNew York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API