Legal Opinion
Webb v. Heyman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 13, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Bichard Prbndergast, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.
On the 1st day of May, 1890, the appellant was in possession of the premises, No. 151 Clark street, in the city of Chicago, holding over from a demise of which the following receipt was the evidence:
“Received of James V. Webb rent for 151 Clark street, same being for one month, ending April 24, 1890, $100.
Hathaway, Soule & Harrington,
T. H. Chamberlain.”
The appellee then had a lease from the landlords of the appellant, dated February 12, 1890, for a term beginning May 1, 1890, and ending April 30, 1892.
The appellant was wrongfully in possession, his term having expired. He was a trespasser.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clinton Wire Cloth Co. v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Keegan v. KinnareIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Gazzolo v. ChambersIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Ball v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Gable v. WetherholtIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by1 opinion
- First National Bank of Chicago v. BohnhorstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940