Legal Opinion
Hayden v. 3M Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 2017No. 2016-C-1030PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Roland L. Belsome
hln preparation for trial on this meso-thelioma case, the plaintiff served trial subpoenas on numerous defendant corporations for the in-court appearance of a corporate representative at trial. The defendant corporations filed motions to quash the subpoenas. The trial court granted the motions to quash as to the corporations that were not domiciled in Louisiana. The plaintiff filed an application for supervisory writs to this Court, which was denied in a 2-1 decision.1 Thereafter, the plaintiff filed a writ application in the Louisiana Supreme Court. Subsequently, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OKC LTD.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Hohner v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Cattle Farms, Inc. v. AbercrombieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Cattle Farms, Inc. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Broda v. Jack Sutton Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ronald Clark McMaster v. Union Carbide Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019