Legal Opinion
State Bank v. Dan-Bar Contracting Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1960PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.
The four above-entitled actions, although not consolidated, were tried together.
The actions involve four separate public improvement contracts awarded to defendant Dan-Bar Contracting- Co. Inc., *489hereinafter referred to as “ Contractor ”, In each instance, the contract was completed by “ Contractor ” and on each contract there is a balance due to ‘ ‘ Contractor ’ ’, which is being withheld by the State by reason of claims against the funds by State Bank of Albany, hereinafter called “ Bank ” on assignments by “ Contractor ” to it, and by Maryland Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to as “…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Triborough Bridge AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Chittenden Lumber Co. v. Silberblatt & Lasker, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Triple Cities Construction Co. v. Dan-Bar Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Triple Cities Constr. Co. v. Dan-Bar Contracting Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Tri-City Electric Co. v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Dutchess Quarry & Supply Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of NewarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In Re Dutcher Construction CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1961
- Extruded Louver Corp. v. McNultyNew York Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.