Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Eskew

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1974No. 39343Published

1DissentNewton, J.

I cannot agree with the reversal, of this case on either of the grounds advanced in the majority opinion.

With reference to the discovery motion, the record discloses that the court made careful inquiry in regard to each phase of the motion. I will discuss them in the order in which they appear in the motion and the majority opinion.(1) It does not appear that any written or taped statement was given by the defendant and none was placed or offered in evidence. (2) Defendant’s counsel stated he knew defendant’s criminal record but wondered if the State had anything else. Two prior convictions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EdgellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Pickerell v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. United States v. Willis G. KyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Cabaniss v. City of TuscaloosaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Anderson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API