Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doe v. Maryland Board of Social Work Examiners

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 9, 2004No. 18 September Term., 2004Published

1Dissent

Dissenting opinion by

BATTAGLIA, J.

which RAKER, J., joins.

I respectfully dissent. The enforceability of the subpoena at issue in this case is directed not only to the treatment records of Jane and John Doe, but to all the other clients of Ms. F., the licensed social worker in this case. I believe that those other clients have a privacy interest at stake1 and that under the circumstances presented here, the State has not presented a sufficient compelling state interest to overcome the confidentiality and statutory privilege attached to those records. A social worker’s client has a strong…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. UNITED STATES of America v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Horridge v. St. Mary's County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Dr. K. v. State Board of Physician Quality AssuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API