Legal Opinion
Rockwell v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided February 15, 2008No. A-9748PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
Michael L. Rockwell appeals his convictions for felony driving while under the influence and driving while license cancelled, suspended, or revoked. 1 Rockwell’s principal argument on appeal is that he was subjected to custodial interrogation in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 2 and that the superior court should have suppressed the statements he made during that interrogation. As explained in this opinion, we agree that Rockwell’s Miranda rights were violated during the latter portions of his interrogation, and we believe there is a reasonable possibility that his…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wassillie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
- Lujan v. NaranjoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Rockwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- State v. BooneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.