Legal Opinion
T.D.H. v. O'Connell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 2008No. ED 89929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent appeals from the judgment of the trial court entering a full order of protection against him pursuant to the Adult Abuse Act, sections 455.010 through 455.090 RSMo (Cum.Supp.2006). His sole claim on appeal is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The order of protection expired on September 17, 2007, and the case was not submitted until May 6, 2008. We dismiss the appeal because it is moot.
Respondent, John O’Connell, and petitioner, T.D.H., were neighbors. On December 19, 2006, petitioner filed an Adult Abuse/Stalking Petition for Order of Protection against respondent.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kinsky v. SteigerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Glover v. MichaudMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jenkins v. McLeodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Reay v. PhilipsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Flaherty v. MeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M.W. v. MabryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Carlisle v. CarlisleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Warlick v. WarlickMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- K.D. v. AlosiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State of Missouri ex rel., Justice for Ken, Kathy Allen and Vincent Bandermann v. Robert E. Parks and Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney's OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019