Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marriage of Olsen v. Olsen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1996No. C7-95-2493Published

1DissentSchumacher, Judge

I respectfully dissent. We must affirm the trial court’s findings of fact supporting the conclusion that the North Shore property is nonmarital unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See Campion v. Campion, 385 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Minn.App.1986). “Clearly erroneous” means “manifestly contraiy to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Northern States Poiver Co. v. Lyon Food Prods., 304 Minn. 196, 201, 229 N.W.2d 521, 524 (1975).

The conveyance of the property to the parties as joint tenants and the designation of both parties as recipients of the gift…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Marriage of Campion v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Marriage of Moon v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API