Legal Opinion
Hill v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 23, 1983No. 83-477PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
434 So.2d 974 (1983)
Verdell HILL, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 83-477.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 23, 1983.
Verdell Hill, Jr., pro se.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Margene A. Roper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This matter is before us upon a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner alleges he is being held unlawfully because he is serving a sentence greater than the law allows. He says the trial court was duty-bound to sentence him under the Florida…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vagner v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Tittle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chaplin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. UpshawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.