Legal Opinion

People v. Corona

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1989No. A021804PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. Introduction

In this case we affirm a judgment of conviction on 25 counts of first degree murder and hold, among other things, that (1) systematic but non-purposeful denial of a fair cross-section of the community in the selection of a grand jury does not require reversal absent prejudice relating to the conviction, and (2) the consular privilege to withhold evidence in criminal proceedings is held and may be waived only by the consul’s government, not the individual consul, but the defendant is not a holder of the privilege and thus on appeal is statutorily precluded from…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. CarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Union Bank of California, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API