Legal Opinion
Ferrantelli v. Wright
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1977No. 7997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTT, Judge.
Plaintiff has appealed from a dismissal of his claim for damages allegedly resulting from an assault and battery perpetrated on him on March 14,1973, by defendants, Horace Wright and his son Billy. When the testimony was completed the trial judge gave the following reasons for his judgment:
“From the evidence the Court concludes that Mr. Wright did not hit Anthony, that the only fighting that took place consisted of pushing and scuffling, wrestling on the ground between the two boys; that both of these boys leave an awful lot to be desired in these premises, both by their conduct…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Tripoli v. GurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Jeansonne v. WillieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Danos v. Central National Insurance Co. of OmahaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Mackbee v. Ford Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coleman v. EgleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Brown v. State Mut. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979