Legal Opinion
New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1999No. 7:95-mj-00554PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
This action concerns whether the Turning Stone Casino’s offering of a new game called Instant Multi-Game (“Multi-Game”) 1 violates the Compact executed between Plaintiff, the State of New York (the “State”), and Defendant the Oneida Indian Nation of New York (the “Nation”).
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721 (“IGRA”), was passed by Congress in 1988, among other reasons, “to provide a statutory basis for the operation of gaming by Indian tribes as a means of promoting tribal economic development,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Village of Union SpringsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Myers v. Seneca Niagara CasinoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene TribeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2014