Legal Opinion

Rorback v. Dorsheimer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The' opinion, of the Chancellor is reported in 8 C. E. Green 47.

1Opinion of the Court

*517The opinion of the court was delivered by

The Chief Justice.

The facts involved in this controversy will be found so fully stated in the opiniou of the Chancellor, read in the court below, that I feel it is quite unnecessary here to reproduce them in detail. They will, consequently, be referred to in a general way, and only so far as may be requisite to present the questions considered and decided.

Mary Dorsheimer, alleging herself to be an idiot, by her guardian, exhibited this bill. The purpose was to recover her distributive share in the estate of her grandfather. This ancestor died…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. F.S.T. Corp. v. OnoratoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Webb v. Updike-Kennedy Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API