Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided May 6, 1929No. 1738PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

This case is submitted upon the government’s demurrer to the amended complaint in intervention. The C. I. T. Corporation, intervener, is the assignee of the vendor in a conditional sale contract of the automobile in question, and the transportation of the liquor was by Smith, Hendricks, and Totterdale, who were sentenced in this court for the unlawful transportation of liquor and other violations of the National Prohibition Act. Totterdale was the purchaser of the automobile. Intervener acquired title to the automobile by reason of the default of the purchaser to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  2. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API