Legal Opinion

Burford v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1937No. 6 Div. 107Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

BOULDIN, Justice.

The opinion is seriously challenged upon the ground that an instrument purporting to convey a leasehold interest in lands, for a longer term than one year, but fatally defective for want of adequate description of the premises, is void,- and a void instrument cannot be ratified.

The argument proceeds on the idea that such case is not within the statute of frauds, and the instrument is void wholly apart from the statute of frauds.

Suffice to say the note or memorandum required under Code § 8034, subd. 5, calls for a description of the property, identification of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vinyard v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Shakespeare v. AlbaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Alabama Mineral Land Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Jones v. GainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Adams v. RiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API