Legal Opinion

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Rupert Pondt

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 6, 1972No. 71-1395PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge

In United States v. Small, 443 F.2d 497 (3d Cir. 1971), we reaffirmed the evidentiary rule in this circuit that an extrajudicial statement by a witness in a federal criminal proceeding is inadmissible as substantive evidence of the facts asserted therein. This appeal from a judgment of conviction based on a jury verdict of guilty of attempted burglary in the third degree, 14 V.I.C. §§ 331, 444, requires us to decide whether 5 V.I.C. § 932 permits use of such a statement as substantive evidence in a criminal proceeding brought by the Government of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Hipolito Rivera SolisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Edward Kenneth Small, Jr. Appeal of Samuel Samson AllenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  2. Government of the Virgin Islands v. SampsonDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2000
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. David Ray Dyches, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Government of Virgin Islands v. DychesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Allan Hensley St. AngeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API