Legal Opinion

People v. Berkoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1985No. B007754PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

After denial of his motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5, defendant pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine for the purpose of sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351). The trial court placed defendant on probation for three years, subject to, among other conditions, spending the first 35 days in county jail and paying a $1,000 fine. Defendant appeals, claiming an improper denial of his suppression motion. Affirmed.

Facts:

After receiving information from a citizen informant on the “WE-TIP” telephone line that defendant was selling cocaine from apartment No. 128…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GesnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. People v. LamasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API