Legal Opinion

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Borchert

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2000No. 97-297PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Employer, The Sherwin-Williams Company (Sherwin-Williams), appeals the decision by a hearing examiner finding Cedric Borc-hert’s claim for worker’s compensation benefits and request for hearing were filed timely and awarding partial medical benefits.

We reverse.

ISSUES

The Sherwin-Williams Company, as appellant, presents the following issues:

Was it error to award Appellee (Employee/Claimant below) worker’s compensation benefits?

Under the facts of this case, this issue includes the following sub-issues:

*961Was there a failure by Appellee to timely report his alleged injury and to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scherling v. KilgoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Thornberg v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Casper Oil Co. v. EvensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Worker's Compensation Claim of Olheiser v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Clark v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kenyon v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wesaw v. Quality MaintenanceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Worker's Compensation Claim of Bruns v. TW Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. Lysne (In re Lysne)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API