Legal Opinion
Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Yoruk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order *933and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment striking the amended answer and dismissing the counterclaims in this action to foreclose two consolidated mortgages. The court properly dismissed the first counterclaim alleging a violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 USC § 1691 et seq. [ECOA]). Plaintiff established as a matter of law that it did not violate the ECOA or a regulation promulgated thereunder when it denied defendant an extension of credit by its submission of evidentiary proof in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Penato v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Appel v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Hallman's Budget Rent-A-Car of Rochester, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Mercado Garcia v. Ponce Federal Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- SNS Bank v. CitibankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. PRIME, L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Harris v. Key Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Buffalo & Erie County Regional Development Corp. v. World Auto Parts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Commerce Point Capital, Inc. v. First Data CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.