Danyluk v. Gitlin

Motion by defendants for an order dispensing with signing and notarization of transcript; ordering a re-examination before trial; and awarding costs for these applications is denied, with $10 costs.

The fact that the defendant may be dissatisfied with his examination before trial presents no ground for its suppression or for directing a new examination. The claimed inaccuracy in the transcription of the examination is not supported by counsel who represented the defendant at the examination. While gross inaccuracy is alleged, attention is called to relatively few mistakes, and there is…