Legal Opinion

United States v. James Benjamin Bray

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1971No. 31006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

In this Dyer Act case, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312, appellant Bray contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdict against him; (2) that the court below erred in permitting the Government to cross-examine him about his prior criminal record; (3) that the court below erred in permitting the Government to cross-examine him concerning the failure of his witnesses to testify; and (4) that he was denied due process of law because counsel was not appointed to represent him until nine days before his trial. We affirm the judgment below in all respects.

I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Raymond Alfred Beaudine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. James Benjamin Bray, No. 31006 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API