United States v. James Benjamin Bray
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
In this Dyer Act case, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312, appellant Bray contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdict against him; (2) that the court below erred in permitting the Government to cross-examine him about his prior criminal record; (3) that the court below erred in permitting the Government to cross-examine him concerning the failure of his witnesses to testify; and (4) that he was denied due process of law because counsel was not appointed to represent him until nine days before his trial. We affirm the judgment below in all respects.
I.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Raymond Alfred Beaudine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.