Legal Opinion

Kirkman v. Kirkman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by the surviving partners to have, the "value of the interest of a deceased partner ascertained and paid.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

It seems to be the modem rule, that while the firm name belongs to surviving partners, the good will is property in which the representatives of a deceased partner participate. Dougherty v. Van Nostrand, 1 Hoff. Ch. 68; 2 Lind. Part. 443; 3 Kent’s Com. 64. In this case there was something for good will to attach to, as the partnership owned the place of business. Also, the partnership articles provide that the value of the interest of the deceased partner shall be ascertained and paid (i. e., if the survivors continue the business), and that is the object of this suit. The effect of such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dougherty v. Van NostrandNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fisk v. Fisk, Clark & FlaggNew York Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API