Hannaford v. Carlson

This is an action of contract to recover money alleged to be owing on two promissory notes. The answer of the defendants, Emil A. Carlson and Anna A.. Carlson, *101is a general denial, and many other defenses, including lack of consideration, illegality and that the execution of the notes was contrary to public policy.

This report should have been condensed in accordance with the Rules of the District Courts, 1965, as amended; it contains 21 pages. There are twelve objections to the admissibility of evidence. All of this testimony was accepted de bene, and the plaintiff’s motion to strike the…