Legal Opinion

Adamo v. P. G. Motor Freight, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJames W. Bailey, J.

Defendant Village of Mamaroneck moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

A dog had been injured and lay on the highway. Plaintiff, a bystander, was directed by a police officer of the village to direct traffic while he, the police officer, left the scene to make a telephone call. Plaintiff was struck by an oncoming car and seeks to hold the village liable in damages.

The police officer was acting for the village in its exercise of a governmental function, in which it is not liable for torts of its agents unless such liability is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herman v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Hughes v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Ferrier v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adamo v. P. G. Motor Freight, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API