Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Gosselin

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided February 24, 2006No. 05-0255/AFPublished

1DissentCrawford, Judge

Recently the Supreme Court ruled, “[T]he constitutional prerequisites of a valid plea may be satisfied where the record accurately reflects that the nature of the charge and the elements of the crime were explained to the defendant by his own, competent counsel.” Bradshaw v. Stumpf 545 U.S. 175, 125 S.Ct. 2398, 2405, 162 L.Ed.2d 143 (2005). In the present case, the record of trial reads:

MJ: I take it that you talked to your attorney about accomplice liability. In other words even though you weren’t the one who actually brought them on to the military installation, that you were a party to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API