Board of Trustees v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentChief Justice Toal
Respectfully, I dissent. In my opinion, the General Assembly effectively overrode the gubernatorial veto of Act 308. Accordingly, I would reach the merits of the Board’s second constitutional challenge and find Act 308 is constitutional special legislation.
*286I. The Yeto Override
I agree with the majority’s acknowledgement that “absent a constitutional mandate providing otherwise, each house in the General Assembly determines its rules of procedure free from interference with judicial and executive branches.” However, I disagree with the majority’s determination that our constitution provides…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Moseley v. WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Sirrine v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- McElveen v. StokesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.