Legal Opinion

Rohlfing v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1951No. 28,806Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Draper, J.

In its petition for rehearing, apparently prepared by the prosecuting attorney of the 69th Judicial Circuit, the State complains that we held, in effect, that articles seized in an unlawful search “becomes sacred and inaccessible.” We did not mean to so hold.

The cases below noted are now cited to sustain the State’s assertion that where knowledge of the defend-, ant’s possession of articles used or useful in violating the law is gained or had by witnesses independently, of the violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights,the testimony of such witnesses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Shorter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API