Legal Opinion

Parsley v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1928No. 6173Published

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

The defendant complains of a judgment rendered against it in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of a certain insurance policy on household goods and personal effects on account of loss iby fire.

The policy sued on provides that, in the event of additional insurance, the insurer shall not be liable for a greater proportion of any loss or damage than the amount thereby insured shall bear to the whole insurance covering the property.

At the conclusion of the evidence (the administrator of insured being the only witness), the trial court over the objection of the defendant, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Null v. BowmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lohr v. WolfeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API