Legal Opinion

People v. Searor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s claim regarding jail-time credit is not properly before this court on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (CPL 450.10 et seq; People v Curtis, 143 AD2d 1030, lv denied 73 NY2d 890; People v Leonard, 133 AD2d 938). Defendant’s proper remedy is by way of a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the prison authorities’ calculation of the jail-time credit to which he claims entitlement (People v Curtis, supra, at 1030; People v Vivenzio, 103 AD2d 1044, 1045; People v Blake, 39 AD2d 587). (Appeal from judgment of Oswego…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. VivenzioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. People v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. People v. LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. AtkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. ATKINSON, PAUL F., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. AtkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. PaulinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API