Legal Opinion

Malcolm, Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 3, 1963No. [No. 354, September Term, 1962.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

232 Md. 222 (1963)

192 A.2d 281

MALCOLM, JR.

v.

STATE

[No. 354, September Term, 1962.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 3, 1963.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.

Charles A. Friedman, with whom were David Friedman, Friedman & Friedman on the brief, for appellant.

Stuart H. Rome, Assistant Attorney General, with whom was Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, William J. O'Donnell, State's Attorney, and George J. Helinski, Assistant State's Attorney, on the brief, for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · PrescottPrescott, J.

Appellant was found guilty of robbery by a judge of the Criminal Court of…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Tasco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Butz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Holtman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API