Legal Opinion
City of Chicago v. Atwood
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Writ of Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert H. Scott, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn
This was an action by the city of Chicago to recover a penalty for an alleged violation of section 1880 of the Chicago code of 1911, which is as follows:
“Prohibited closets — Removal.—Pan, plunger, offset, washout-range closets and wash-out latrines shall not be allowed in any building, nor shall hopper-closets be installed in any building hereafter erected. Such closets, when found to be a nuisance, shall be removed, or when the same are removed for repairs they shall not be again installed,” etc.
A fine of not less than $25 nor more than $200 is provided for a violation of the ordinance. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wahle v. ReinbachIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Tomle v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Collinsville v. SeiberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- City of Chicago v. AtkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- City of Chicago v. HadesmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Clerken v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- People v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1921