Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Atwood

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert H. Scott, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

This was an action by the city of Chicago to recover a penalty for an alleged violation of section 1880 of the Chicago code of 1911, which is as follows:

“Prohibited closets — Removal.—Pan, plunger, offset, washout-range closets and wash-out latrines shall not be allowed in any building, nor shall hopper-closets be installed in any building hereafter erected. Such closets, when found to be a nuisance, shall be removed, or when the same are removed for repairs they shall not be again installed,” etc.

A fine of not less than $25 nor more than $200 is provided for a violation of the ordinance. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wahle v. ReinbachIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Tomle v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Miller v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Collinsville v. SeiberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. City of Chicago v. AtkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  3. City of Chicago v. HadesmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Clerken v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. People v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API