Legal Opinion
LaRene v. LaRene
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 28, 1986No. 85-1258PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLarocque, J.
Paul LaRene appeals an order for the sale of property of which he is one-quarter owner. He contends that the property should be partitioned rather than sold and that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order a sale. Because the trial court followed the correct statutory procedure in ordering the sale, we affirm.
Paul LaRene and the three respondents own forty acres of land as tenants in common. Paul has lived on a small portion of the property for most of his life. Included on that portion is a one-room building and a small outbuilding.
The three respondents brought a partition action under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kollasch v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sonnenburg v. GrohskopfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- LOCAL 913 v. Manitowoc CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Frank v. Personnel CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Schmidt v. HudecDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- Maloney v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.