Legal Opinion
Matrusciello v. Milliken Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by the plaintiff, Lorenzo Matrnsciello, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Richmond on the 29th day of May, 1908, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court upon the pleadings at the Richmond Trial Term, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 29tli day of June, 1908, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, J.:
I think the notice served in this case stated the time, place and cause of the injury with sufficient accuracy.- It was as follows:
“ To Milliken Brothers, Inc.,
“ | 11 Broadway,
“New York City:
“Sirs.— Please take notice, that I, the undersigned, on April 22nd, 1907, at about 10 : 30 p. m. while in your employ working in connection with your contracting operation at Mariners Harbor, Staten Island, New York, was struck, injured and run over by one of your cars or trains & sustained serious, painful and permanent injuries to my body, especially to my leg, which was so injured as to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Donnell v. John H. Parker Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Palmieri v. S. Pearson & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bertolami v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Matrusciello v. Milliken Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Rodzborski v. American Sugar Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Bertolami v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909