Legal Opinion

Croce v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 2010PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs service of an admittedly late notice of claim was a nullity (McGarty v City of New York, 44 AD3d 447, 448 [2007]), and his failure to seek a court order excusing such lateness within the time limited for commencement of the action (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]), i.e., within one year and 90 days after the happening of the accident (General Municipal Law § 50-i [1] [c]), requires dismissal of the action (McGarty, supra). We reject plaintiff s argument that, by virtue of CPLR 306-b, his time to. seek leave to serve a late notice of claim was extended until 120 days after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGarty v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bobko v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Baptiste v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Abad v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Abad v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Bobko v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API