Legal Opinion
Muller v. Colony Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 2010No. 2010 CA 0688PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhipple, J.
|2In this appeal, an insurance company challenges the trial court’s ruling, which found that the commercial general liability policy at issue provided coverage for the plaintiffs injuries. Plaintiff has answered the appeal, challenging issues of allocation of fault and quantum. For the following reasons, we amend and affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Janet Sue Muller is a sole proprietor doing business as Sno-Mobile of Louisiana, a snow-party business.1 Conducting a snow party entails creating snow from shaved ice, spreading the snow on a tarp with a rake or squeegee, and coordinating snow…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Daigle v. US Fidelity and Guar. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Duzon v. StallworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Admiral Insurance v. Willson (In re Central Louisiana Grain Cooperative, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Willson v. Vanderlick (In re Central Louisiana Grain Cooperative, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2012