Legal Opinion
United States v. Jean Pierre Deandino
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1992No. 91-5895PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
The appellant, the United States of America, contests the district court’s dismissal of the indictment as insufficient. The indictment alleged that appellee, Jean Pierre DeAndino, violated 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) because he “did knowingly and willfully transmit in interstate commerce ... a communication containing a threat to injure.” For the following reasons, we reverse the decision of the district court and find that the indictment is sufficient.
I
On November 19, 1990, an indictment was returned in the United States District Court for the Western District of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. James TwineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Larry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Richard C. HimelwrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Peter DarbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. TeagueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.