Legal Opinion

Anides v. Kahar Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action by vendees of real property to impress a lien thereon and to recover the amount paid on account of the contract of sale, on the ground of alleged false representations as to the condition of the building and other matters, the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disburse*823ments. (Of. Massler v. Smit, 279 App. Div. 941, and Hettinger v. Abeles, 283 App. Div. 726.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs but adheres to his views expressed in the dissenting- memorandum in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massler v. SmitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Hellinger v. AbelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rizzi v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Benitez v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. Mercogliano Lumber Corp. v. Sea Cliff Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API